When news leaked in June of 2013 about the NSA’s secret data gathering program PRISM, which was
aimed at trawling online spaces for suspicious communications without even the
most rudimentary nods to due process or probable cause, one major tech company
was noticeably absent from the list of participating companies. Despite
accruing user information, including location data, on approximately 500
million users, Twitter has long resisted governmental requests for user data.
How did Twitter manage to escape participating in the NSA program’s information
grab? More specifically, do Twitter’s privacy policies and official
communications about user privacy communicate a peculiar attitude toward
privacy that differs from their social media counterparts?
In order to
understand how Twitter managed to resist the NSA’s PRISM data grab, this
presentation examines two articulations of Twitter’s view of privacy: the
official Privacy Policy and Twitter’s biannual Twitter Transparency Report. The
first third of the presentation offers a comparison between Twitter’s Privacy
Policy and social media peer Facebook, paying particular attention to Twitter’s
emphasis on user rights, something notably absent from Facebook’s policy. The
second third of the presentation examines the most recent Twitter Transparency
Report, which covers the first half of 2013, and suggests that the rationale
behind the report, which is still in its infancy, offers important insight into the
company’s commitment to protect user information. The final third of the
presentation presents a heuristic for social media users and technical
communicators to assess privacy policies in the hopes that better understanding
the privacy policies of the digital spaces we inhabit might allow consumers to
make more informed decisions and technical writers to help construct more
ethical privacy policies.
No comments:
Post a Comment